¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
474 Mich. 1127
712 N.W.2d 475
Docket Docket No. 130156. COA No. 263714.
PINGLE v. Powers
Timothy Lee PINGLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pamela Dawn POWERS and Paul Benjamin Powers, Defendants-Appellants.
Decided April 28, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-04-28
Decided 2006-04-28