¶1{concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur with the lead opinion’s analysis and conclusions regarding the scoring of the offense variables and the admissibility of the evidence of defendant’s prior felony convictions. However, for the reasons stated in my dissent in People v Francisco, 474 Mich 82; 711 NW2d 44 (2006), I dissent from the conclusion that a remand for resentencing is required in this case.
474 Mich. 96
712 N.W.2d 703
People v. Johnson
Decided March 23, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-03-23
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-03-23
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 2022
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →