¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for dismissal is DENIED as moot.
474 Mich. 990
707 N.W.2d 590
Docket Docket Nos. 129938 & (64). COA No. 259222.
Peric v. Peric
Predrag PERIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wendy Leigh PERIC, Defendant-Appellee.
Decided December 28, 2005.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2005-12-28
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2006
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-12-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →