Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 Pa. 190 - Commonwealth v. Romberger

Commonwealth v. Romberger’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (1985), 290 Pa. Super. 476 - Mitchell v. United Elevator Co., Inc. (1981)

47 state decisions

25019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Brown v. Illinois · Michigan v. Tucker · United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A lower court is without power to modify, alter, amend, set aside or in any manner disturb or depart from the judgment of the reviewing court as to any matter decided on appeal. . . . Under any other rule, litigation would never cease, and finality and respect for orderly process of law would be overcome by chaos and contempt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is a fundamental doctrine in this jurisdiction that where an issue is cognizable in a given proceeding and is not raised it is waived and will not be considered on a review of that proceeding.” (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.