Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

474 So. 2d 11

474 So.2d 11

10 Fla.L.Weekly 1934

Dougherty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 13, 1985

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-08-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1986

1 state decisions

Relies on 472 So. 2d 792 - Dewberry v. State · 472 So. 2d 1278 - Richardson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-08-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶1This is an appeal from a sentence imposed pursuant to the sentencing guidelines, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

¶2The appellant was sentenced on September 4, 1984 for an offense committed on April 6, 1984. During the interim between the commission of the offense and the date of sentencing, the sentencing guidelines were amended in a manner disadvantageous to the appellant resulting in a presumptive sentence longer than the presumptive sentence prescribed by the guidelines in effect at the time appellant’s offense was committed. Under such circumstances, it is error to apply the amended guidelines. Richardson v. State, 472 So.2d 1278, (Fla.1st DCA 1985). Compare Dewberry v. State, 472 So.2d 792, (Fla.1st DCA 1985), wherein the court affirmed the application of the amended guidelines to a pre-amendment offense because the prescribed presumptive penalty for the offense was the same under both the original guidelines and the amended guidelines.

¶3Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.
/474/so2d/11 · .json · Public domain