Diaz v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1985

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1985-07-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1991

2 state decisions

Relies on 474 So. 2d 171 - Diaz v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-07-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1WRIT DENIED.

FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, and ADAMS, JJ., concur. TORBERT, C.J., concurs specially. TORBERT, Chief Justice

¶2(concurring specially).

¶3I agree that the writ should be denied. However, I wish to point out that I do not agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion that the factual statement of the disciplinary court is ■ inadequate. I agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion, 474 So.2d 171, that petitioner was entitled to a hearing in circuit court on the merits of his allegations only because he was allegedly denied an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses at the disciplinary hearing.