474 So. 2d 182 - Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1989
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Carlock · Carter v. State · Wilson v. Orr · 449 So. 2d 1264 - Blackmon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A specific ground of objection waives all other grounds. Cooper v. State , 474 So.2d 182 , 183 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985). 'It is well settled that all grounds of objection not specified are waived, and that the trial court will not be placed in error on grounds not raised at trial.' Blackmon v. State , 449 So.2d 1264 , 1266 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(a) Any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state shall be deemed to have given his consent, subject to the provisions of this division, to a chemical test or tests of his blood, breath or urine for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood if lawfully arrested for any offense arising out of acts alleged to have been committed while the person was driving a motor vehicle on the public highways of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The test or tests shall be administered at the direction of a law enforcement officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person to have been driving a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The law enforcement agency by which such officer is employed shall designate *Page 242 which of the aforesaid tests shall be administered. Such person shall be told that his failure to submit to such a chemical test will result in the suspension of his privilege to operate a motor vehicle for a period of 90 days; provided if such person objects to a blood test, the law enforcement agency shall designate that one of the other aforesaid tests be administered."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.