Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 SO2D 30 - State v. Ross

State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1987
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 458 So. 2d 454 - State v. Martin · 345 So. 2d 468 - State v. Fearn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 921 provides that: A judgment or ruling shall not be reversed by an appellate court because of any error, defect, irregularity, or variance which does not affect substantial rights of the accused. In State v. Gibson, 391 So.2d 421 (La.1980), the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the ‘harmless error’ test of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). Under the ‘harmless error’ test, it must be determined ‘whether there is a reasonable possibility that the admission or exclusion of certain evidence, depending on the case, might have contributed to the conviction’ and further that the reviewing court ‘must be able to declare that the error was “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” ’ State v. Martin, 458 So.2d 454, 459 (La.1984); Gibson, supra.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.