474 So. 2d 336 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “no showing either that the witness in question was unforeseeably or unavoidably absent or that his presence was `uniquely necessary for a full and adequate trial,' so that none of the prerequisites of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(f)(1) were satisfied.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 873 So. 2d 598 - Clark v. State

2. “(1) unexpected illness, unexpected incapacity, or unforeseeable and unavoidable absence of a person whose presence or testimony is uniquely necessary for a full and adequate trial;”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 873 So. 2d 598 - Clark v. State