474 So. 2d 36 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1986
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sepulvado · 389 So. 2d 1263 - State v. Douglas · State v. Brooks · 412 So. 2d 1313 - State v. Robicheaux · State v. Goodman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““... when I consider that just very recently this defendant was placed on probation for a drug offense, that he performed poorly as a probationer, I believe that even though this appears to be a first felony conviction for this defendant, he is not a proper subject for probationary treatment....” La.C.Cr.P. Art. 894.1(A) states: “A. When a defendant has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor, the court should impose a sentence of imprisonment if: (1) There is an undue risk that during the period of a suspended sentence or probation the defendant will commit another crime; (2) The defendant is in need of correctional treatment or a custodial environment that can be provided most effectively by his commitment to an institution; or (3) A lesser sentence will deprecate the seriousness of the defendant’s crime.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“C. The court shall state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis therefor in imposing sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.