Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 SO2D 523 - State v. Cox

State v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2001
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2001

18 state decisions

140198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Hunter · State v. Duncan · 412 So. 2d 1313 - State v. Robicheaux · State v. Davis · 404 So. 2d 1202 - State v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Now the court because of the circumstances feels that a lesser penalty would deprecate the seriousness of the crime. The court feels that this type of crime is one that requires institutionalization. I too have read the presentence report, which of course is confidential, but there are some disclosures which convince me of what I am saying."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he technical sufficiency of an indictment may not be raised after conviction where the accused has been fairly informed of the charge against him and has not been prejudiced by surprise or lack of notice and will not be truly subject to any jeopardy of further prosecution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “if the record otherwise clearly illumines the trial court sentencing choice and demonstrates that the sentence is not arbitrary or excessive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.