Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 S.W.2d 189 - Westerfeld v. Huckaby

Westerfeld v. Huckaby’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2012

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

6019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McMurry v. Stanley · National Shawmut Bank v. Joy · 5 Ill. 2d 417 - Farkas v. Williams · Nickson v. Filtrol Corporation · Ridge v. Bright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Professor Bogert expresses the view that a majority of the cases now upholds the validity of an intervivos trust even though the settlor reserves a life estate combined with many powers of management, and that the settlor may retain the powers to alter, revoke and take capital as well as the powers to direct and manage. According to Bogert, the beneficiary receives a defeasible interest at the time of the execution of the instrument; the accumulation of reserved powers only subjects the interest of the beneficiary to a greater possibility of defeasance. G. Bogert, Trusts and Trustees § 104 at 536-542 (2d ed. 1965). See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 261 S.W.2d 892 (Tex.Civ.App.1953, writ ref.). [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the trend of the modern authorities is to uphold an inter vivos trust no matter how extensive may be the powers over the administration of the trust reserved by the settlor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.