Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 SW2D 466 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 1993
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 1993

21 state decisions

110197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Brown v. State · Hoover v. State · 53 Tex. Crim. 349 - Gibson v. State · Corbitt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not view either of these statements, introduced by the State, as being exculpatory so as to require the charge requested. See McClelland v. State, Tex. Cr.App., 389 S.W.2d 678 . As in Gibson v. State, 53 Tex.Cr.R. 349 , 110 S.W. 41, 48 , there is no admission or statement admitting the killings but seeking to justify and excuse the same. The same statements were offered by the State `as tending to show the account given by appellant was untrue, known to him to be untrue, and therefore incriminating evidence against him, in that they show an effort and scheme to shield himself from the force and effect of his presence at the scene of the homicide and other facts tending to connect him with the murder.' See also Asner v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 420 , 136 S.W.2d 822, 826 ; Grady v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 466 S.W.2d 770 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “wearing coveralls and that he (Brown) did not know how blood had gotten on his shirt when it was shown to him was not exculpatory. The Court stated:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “... he (Davis) came in to get some gas and that it looked like somebody had broken into the office.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.