Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 S.W.2d 696 - Cole v. State

Cole v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1990

17 state decisions

90197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Biggers v. State of Tennessee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although identification procedure whereby suspects are viewed singly by a witness rather than as part of a lineup has been widely condemned, Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 302 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967), due process is not, however, invariably violated by such a procedure. See Biggers v. Tennessee, 390 U.S. 404 , 88 S.Ct. 979 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1267 . Here again we note that each case must be considered on its own facts to determine the likelihood that a particular pretrial confrontation resulted in irreparable misidentification. Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 , 88 S. Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.