Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 SW2D 732 - Hebert v. Loveless

Hebert v. Loveless’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2005

9 state decisions

501971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc. · 68 Tex. Crim. 295 - Burford v. State · Henry v. Phillips · Texas Co. v. Lee · Darryl v. Ford Motor Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Dean Keeton in his article 'Products Liability-Liability Without Fault and the Requirement of a Defect’, 41 Texas L.Rev. 855 , 858 (1963) says: “ ‘The principle of strict liability has been regarded as applicable only when the product leaves the manufacturer’s hands in a defective condition....”’ (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Such incompetent [hearsay] evidence can never form the basis of a finding of fact or of the judgment of a court; and this is so whether it be objected to or not. Henry v. Phillips, 105 Tex. 459 , 151 S.W. 533 ; Austin Bros. v. Patten, Tex.Com.App., 294 S.W. 537 ; 17 Tex.Jur., p. 512, § 211.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Texas is firmly committed to the rule stated in the Restatement of Torts (2d Ed.), § 402 A”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.