Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 SW3D 483 - Reginald Reece v. State

Reginald Reece v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lankston v. State · Wilson v. State · Howard v. State · Sells v. State · Wright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[U]nder Rule 33.1, the party’s objection unless it is apparent from the context, must be specific enough to “let the trial judge know what he wants [and] why he thinks himself entitled to it, and [to] do so clearly enough for the judge to understand him at a time when the trial court is in a proper position to do something about it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.