Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 474 U.S. 344 - Davidson v. Cannon

Davidson v. Cannon’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

2,541
cited by 2,541 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
31
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

849 federal appellate · 288 district · 196 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,541 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably Daniels v. Williams (1986), County of Sacramento v. Lewis (1998)

849 federal appellate · 288 district · 196 state decisions — followed in 31 states

1.0k019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedDavidson v. O'Lone (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · Estelle v. Gamble · Wolff v. McDonnell · United States v. Leon · Bell v. Wolfish

Cited together with Daniels v. Williams · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Estelle v. Gamble · Parratt v. Taylor · Harlow v. Fitzgerald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,541 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was intended to prevent government from abusing [its] power, or employing it as an instrument of oppression.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no procedure for compensation is constitutionally required.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To hold that injury caused by such conduct is a deprivation within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment would trivialize the centuries old principle of due process of law.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.