Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 F.2d 1289 - American Federation of Government Employees v. Acree

American Federation of Government Employees v. Acree’s Empirical Analysis

475 F.2d 1289 · 1973

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
4
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 9 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2002 · most notably Andrade v. Lauer (1984), Community Nutrition Institute v. Block (1983)

20 federal appellate · 9 district · 16 state decisions

2701973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 5 U.S.C. § 7501 (Civil Service Due Process Amendments)

Relies on Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy · McKart v. United States · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein · Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In our judgment, it would be blinking reality to expect the Commission, in an adjudicatory proceeding, to hold an agency subject to its regulations to a higher standard of procedural protection than its own rules require. Nor do we think it likely that the Commission would act in advance of a court in overturning rules promulgated by itself and consistent with the applicable governing statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.