Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 F.2d 1300 - Horace Case v. Arthur E. Morrisette

Horace Case v. Arthur E. Morrisette’s Empirical Analysis

475 F.2d 1300 · 1973

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
5
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), In re Sealed Case (1984)

52 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

47019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) finding is 'clearly erroneous' when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[T]he court on appeal shall not set aside the findings or judgment unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(A) finding is 'clearly erroneous' if it is without substantial evidentiary support or if it was induced by an erroneous application of the law. Beyond that, '(a) finding is "clearly erroneous”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.