Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 F.2d 438 - Rosenthal v. Warren

Rosenthal v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

475 F.2d 438 · 1973

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1997 · most notably Allstate Insurance v. Hague (1981), Ibarra v. United States (1997)

17 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

230197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc. · Babcock v. Jackson · Home Ins Co v. Dick · American Stevedores, Inc. v. Porello

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[Ejxcept for a federal case which relied heavily on a discredited state case, the strong .New York public policy against damage limitations has triumphed over the contrary policies of sister states in every case where a New York domiciliary has brought suit. This conclusion is particularly striking in wrongful death actions where the New York policy, embedded in a state constitutional provision against damage limitations, has without exception been applied in suits brought for New York decedents since Kilberg [v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 9 N.Y.2d 34 , 211 N.Y.S.2d 133 , 172 N.E.2d 526 (1961)].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “giving controlling effect to the law of the jurisdiction which, because of its relationship or contact with the occurrence or the parties, has the greatest concern with the specific issue raised in the litigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “looked to the law of the state with the 'superior interest' in having its policy or law applied.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.