Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 F.2d 591 - Rothgery v. United States

Rothgery v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

475 F.2d 591 · 1973

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
August 2010
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2010

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

10019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is necessary to begin the resolution of any valuation problem by presupposing a “willing seller.” In the present case, therefore, we must begin with the assumption that the decedent’s 125 shares of stock in the corporation were not bequeathed by the decedent to his son, the plaintiff, and that such shares were available for sale by the decedent’s estate as a “willing seller.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.