Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 F.3d 1192 - Karr

Karr’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2023

6 district · 2 state decisions

140200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. · Theodore Smith v. David Plati the University of Colorado · Parker v. Scott · Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Hercules, Inc. · Supporters To Oppose Pollution, Inc. v. Heritage Group

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sufficient information to permit the recipient to identify the specific standard, limitation, or order alleged to have been violated, the activity alleged to constitute a violation, the person or persons responsible for the alleged violation, the location of the alleged violation, [and] the date or dates of such violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “NPDES” stands for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. The CWA generally prohibits the discharge of pollutants except as authorized by a NPDES' permit issued by the EPA or an authorized state, Doc. No. 34 ¶ 114. . Id., Ex. 2 (Consent Decree) at 4. . Id. at 9. . Id. at 5.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must understand from the notice what the citizen is alleging -not what the citizen could allege if the citizen knew more or cared about other possible transgressions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.