Cummings v. Polk’s Empirical Analysis
475 F.3d 230 · 2007
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2020
7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Williams v. Taylor · Moran v. Burbine · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Duckworth v. Eagan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), if the issue on appeal was adjudicated in state court, as it was here, this Court may award habeas corpus relief on a claim that was adjudicated on its merits in state court only if the adjudication”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determination was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.