Ellen v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis
475 F.3d 5 · 2007
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Williams v. Taylor · Doyle v. Ohio · Greer v. Miller · Wainwright v. Greenfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The ultimate question on habeas ... is not how well reasoned the state court decision is, but whether the outcome is reasonable.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 925 , 122 S.Ct. 282 , 151 L.Ed.2d 208 (2001). 6 .The Lowell Police Department form, entitled”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in an instruction to disregard and/or strike from the record, there may not necessarily be a Doyle violation because the government has not been permitted to `use' the defendant's silence against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“post- Miranda silence was not mentioned, by either the prosecutor or a witness, after the judge sustained the objection[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.