Carroll v. Renico’s Empirical Analysis
475 F.3d 708 · 2007
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2021
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Johnson v. Zerbst · Williams v. Taylor · Edwards v. Arizona · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court [has] not addressed] whether “stand in” counsel solves the problem of an absent counsel. Because no United States Supreme Court precedent deals with the issue of “stand in” counsel, the Michigan Courts did not engage in an unreasonable application of Supreme Court precedent when they determined that Carroll was not denied assistance of counsel at the jury reinstruction phase.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the trial judge asked the two jurors whether earlier events affected the verdict. Both jurors said that the earlier events did not affect their decisions as to defendants' guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lang v. Bobby“the trial court received a note from the jury that family members of one of the defendants harassed two jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lang v. Bobby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.