Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 F.3d 926 - Bearden v. Lemon

Bearden v. Lemon’s Empirical Analysis

475 F.3d 926 · 2007

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
October 2022
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably United States v. Lucas (2007), United States v. Williams (2015)

21 federal appellate ·

130200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “summary judgment determinations are appealable when they resolve a dispute concerning an abstract issue of law relating to qualified immunity . . . typically, the issue whether the federal right allegedly infringed was clearly established”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Duckworth
  2. “In considering the immediate appeal from the denial of qualified immunity, the appealable issue is a purely legal one, whether the facts alleged . . . support a claim of violation of clearly established law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Duckworth
  3. “[T]he law is settled that as a general matter the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions ... for speaking out ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.