Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

475 F. App'x 843

Chen v. Holder

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-08-23

Decided 2012-08-23

¶1Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Hui Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Chen’s contentions, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Chen’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2012). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Chen, (B.I.A. Oct. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4PETITION DENIED.

/475/fappx/843 · .json · Public domain