475 F. Supp. 2d 1325 - Daker v. Ferrero’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 666 · 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Anderson v. Creighton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Count 1: Stand-at-attention requirement Count 2: Restrictions on wearing a Kufi Count 3: Content-based denial of mail and publications Count 4: Denial of procedural due process when mail denied (prisoners) Count 5: Denial of procedural due process when mail denied (non-prisoners) Count 6: Requirement that mail be addressed to dormitory count 7: Denial of procedural due process when publications denied (prisoners) Count 8: Content-based denial of foreign language publications Count 9: Denial of procedural to process when publications restricted (non-prisoners) Count 10: Denial of gift publications (that are not paid in full by prisoner) Count 11: Pre-paid Requirement for publications Count 12: Requirement that Prisoner request book by name, title, and description Count 13: Restrictions on size and number of publications possessed Count 14: Seizure of publication without procedural due process Count 15: Denial of legal materials of other inmates Count 16: Requirement that printed material be received from publishers or attorney Count 17: Requirement that specific request be made to receive publications from dealer Count 18: Retaliation for filing this action and related grievances Count 19: Denial of Digital Qur'an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Daker v. Ferrero“(i) a State, county, municipality, or other governmental entity created under the authority of a State; (ii) a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, or official of an entity listed in clause; and (iii) any other person acting under color of State law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Smith v. Allen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.