Commonwealth v. Lawson’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Leland v. Oregon · Commonwealth v. Latimore · Commonwealth v. McHoul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“given the meager weight of [the inference that a defendant is probably sane because most people are sane] and the risk of juror confusion regarding the burden of proof, judges should not instruct juries regarding this inference.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“asserts a defense of lack of criminal responsibility and there is evidence at trial that ... would permit a reasonable finder of fact to have a reasonable doubt whether the defendant was criminally responsible”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A jury instruction concerning the presumption of sanity should be given in every case in which the question of the defendant's criminal responsibility is raised”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.