¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
¶2MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v. Drohan, lv. gtd. 472 Mich. 881, 693 N.W.2d 823 (2005).