¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
475 Mich. 872
714 N.W.2d 323
Docket Docket No. 130633. COA No. 256090.
Fejedelem v. Dimmer
David E. FEJEDELEM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard DIMMER d/b/a R.D. Dimmer & Associates, Defendant-Appellee.
Decided May 30, 2006.
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-05-30
Decided 2006-05-30