Hossman v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1985

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1985-04-01

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2006

2 state decisions

Relies on Hossman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-04-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION ON REHEARING

CONOVER, Judge.

¶2The State of Indiana has filed a Petition for Rehearing which correctly points out our statement the defendant was acquitted of the burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary charges is incorrect. In fact, the jury hung as to these charges. According ly, we have corrected this error by amending our original statement of facts in this regard. 473 N.E.2d 1059 (Ind.App.1985).

¶3This amendment does not, however, lead to a contrary result. Given a hung jury, it is patently obvious the evidence was insufficient for the conviction of Hossman as to those two charges.

¶4Excepting the above, the Petition for Rehearing is in all other respects denied.

MILLER, P.J., and YOUNG, J., concur.