Hopper v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2011
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Elmore v. State · Rowan v. State · Staton v. State · Harding v. State · Askew v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State argues any of the acts listed in the series of acts may serve as the overt act in furtherance of the agreement. * * We first note that a showing of any one of the events listed in the series would have been sufficient to support the Con- . spiracy conviction. The phrase in the Information 'an overt act, to-wit:" might, in some cases, be followed by language describing a single event. In the case at bar, this was not the situation. The jury was instructed the State must allege and prove an overt act. It is reasonable to conclude the jury found one or more of the events in the list was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We find no reversible error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dellenbach v. State“The rule and the statute are not in conflict. To be in compliance with the statute does not require one to violate the rule. While the demands of the statute are more specific than the rule, the statute merely codifies what has been the accepted and required practices under the rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hensley v. State“"(a) A person who knowingly or intentionally exerts unauthorized control over property of another person, with intent to deprive the other person of any part of its value or use, commits theft, a Class D felony." - Ind.Code 85-48-4-2 (Burns Code Repl.1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sharp v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.