Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 P.3d 324 - State v. Willis

State v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · State v. Ward · Washington v. Louisiana · State v. Peppers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fall outside the wide latitude afforded prosecutors to conduct the State's case and attempt to obtain a conviction in a manner that does not offend the defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Under the invited error doctrine, a litigant may not invite error and then complain of that same error on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “stressed that relevance is a generally low threshold.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.