State v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · State v. Ward · Washington v. Louisiana · State v. Peppers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fall outside the wide latitude afforded prosecutors to conduct the State's case and attempt to obtain a conviction in a manner that does not offend the defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Willis“Under the invited error doctrine, a litigant may not invite error and then complain of that same error on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gulley“stressed that relevance is a generally low threshold.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Scheetz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.