Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 Pa. 461 - Commonwealth v. Herron

Commonwealth v. Herron’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 413 Pa. Super. 95 - Commonwealth v. Kennedy (1992), Commonwealth v. Iannaccio (1984)

53 state decisions

200197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Rugendorf v. United States · United States v. Unicorn Enterprises, Inc. · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Ruiz v. District of Columbia Court of General Sessions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . more is necessary than a mere assertion by the defendant that such disclosure might be helpful in establishing a particular defense. . . . Although the defendant plainly cannot be expected to show that such information will actually be helpful to his defense, the record should at least suggest a reasonable possibility that the information might be helpful, so that it would be unfair to withhold it.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““I believe [informant] might offer evidence that the entire plan and format as to how this entire purchase was to be set up was made between the informant and this Police Officer in advance; that the conversations between [defendant] and [informant] may have been much more by predesign; that [informant] may have well been told by this Officer that he was to tell [defendant] certain things to induce the sale, that is, as to where he worked, who he was, who he knew, that sort of thing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.