Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

475 So. 2d 1001

475 So.2d 1001

10 Fla.L.Weekly 2167

Hawks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 19, 1985

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-09-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1986

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“per se sufficient to explain the guideline departure when an alternative program is used.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 498 So. 2d 1294 - Vega v. State

Relies on Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-09-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The valid reasons stated by the trial court for imposing a sentence under the Youthful Offender Act (eh. 958, Fla.Stat.) for offenses committed after July 1, 1984, were per se sufficient “to explain the guideline departure when an alternative program is used.” See Amendment to the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 451 So.2d 824 (Fla.1984).

¶2AFFIRMED.

COBB, C.J., and ORFINGER and CO-WART, JJ., concur.
/475/so2d/1001 · .json · Public domain