475 So. 2d 252 - Burke v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 55 So. 2d 559 - Hearn v. State · Grappin v. State · 462 So. 2d 813 - State v. Watts · Castelberry v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the only basis, if any, for making a substantive differentiation between the three criminal charges, as is necessary to meet the limits imposed by the double jeopardy clause, is that each charge was based on a distinguishably different factual event”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.