Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

475 So. 2d 296

475 So.2d 296

10 Fla.L.Weekly 2139

Hamilton v. Quirk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 13, 1985

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-09-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1990

2 state decisions

Relies on 260 So. 2d 492 - Roberts v. Askew · 467 So. 2d 378 - Constellation Condo. Assoc., Inc. v. Harrington · Kenworth of Tampa, Inc. v. Turnkey Development Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-09-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s judgment on the appeal.

¶2On the cross-appeal, we reverse and remand to the trial court to determine prejudgment interest and reasonable costs to be awarded to the cross-appellant/buyer. See Roberts v. Askew, 260 So.2d 492 (Fla.1972); Constellation Condominium Association, Inc. v. Harrington, 467 So.2d 378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Kenworth of Tampa, Inc. v. Turnkey Development Corp., 407 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); § 57.084, Fla.Stat. (1983).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and FRANK, JJ., concur.
/475/so2d/296 · .json · Public domain