475 So. 2d 593 - Pickron v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2005
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough a motion to amend the sentence does not come within the precise language of Rule 13 (c) [Temporary Rule of Criminal Procedure, effective March 1, 1982], we think it is within the coverage thereof in light of the clear intent of Rule 13 captioned `Post-trial motions.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“when notice of appeal is made or filed before the timely filing of a motion in arrest of judgment, motion for new trial, . . . the time for filing of the court reporter's transcript and the clerk's record shall be governed . . . as if the notice of appeal had been filed on the date of the overruling of such motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Melvin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.