Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 475 SW3D 860 - State v. Johnson, Terence

State v. Johnson, Terence’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Blockburger v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Broadrick v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “With respect to constitutional provisions other than the First Amendment, a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute can succeed only when it is shown that the statute is unconstitutional in all of its applications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A person commits an offense if the person, with the intent to harm or defraud another, obtains, possesses, transfers, or uses an item of identifying information of another person without the other per"son’s consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a 'substantial number' of its applications are unconstitutional, 'judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.