State v. Johnson, Terence’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Blockburger v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Broadrick v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“With respect to constitutional provisions other than the First Amendment, a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute can succeed only when it is shown that the statute is unconstitutional in all of its applications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wagner v. State“A person commits an offense if the person, with the intent to harm or defraud another, obtains, possesses, transfers, or uses an item of identifying information of another person without the other per"son’s consent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a 'substantial number' of its applications are unconstitutional, 'judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Wagner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.