In re Dorsey’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 343 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Richards v. United States · Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall grant relief from the stay...with respect...to real property...if the court finds that the filing of the petition was part of a scheme to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Greenstein“based upon changed circumstances or for good cause shown....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Greenstein“could be due process concerns as to the original borrower,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Greenstein
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.