In re Sivec SRL’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1506 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1521 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1522 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 1410 · 28 U.S.C. § 1452 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Hilton v. Guyot · Citizens Bank of Md. v. Strumpf · Studley v. Boylston National Bank · University Medical Center v. Sullivan · North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden of proof is on the party urging comity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re OI S.A.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.