Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 F.2d 1182 - Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, an Agency of the United States v. Quinn Hogan

Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, an Agency of the United States v. Quinn Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

476 F.2d 1182 · 1973

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
5
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably 78 Ill. 2d 1 - Illinois State Chamber of Commerce v. Pollution Control Board (1979), Jones v. Miles (1981)

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

1701973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Foman v. Davis · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association · Stassen for President Citizens Committee v. Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Many state and federal courts rejected the mutuality requirement, especially where the prior judgment was invoked defensively in a second action against a plaintiff bringing suit on an issue he litigated and lost in a prior action. The trend has been apparent in federal question cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We hold, in line with the many other courts which have reached the same conclusion, that, at least when used “defensively,” mutuality of estoppel should not be required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.