Bazaar v. Fortune’s Empirical Analysis
476 F.2d 570 · 1973
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2007 · most notably Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission (1982), Community-Service Broadcasting of Mid-America, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (1978)
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY · Shelton v. Tucker · Cohen v. California · Sweezy v. State of New Hampshire C Wyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . once a University recognizes a student activity which has elements of free expression, it can act to censor that expression only if it acts consistent with First Amendment constitutional guarantees. . . . (T)he courts have refused to recognize as permissible any regulations infringing free speech when not shown to be necessarily related to the maintenance of order and discipline within the educational process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... (W)e can only reiterate that speech cannot be stifled by the state merely because it would perhaps draw an adverse reaction from the majority of people, be they politicians or ordinary citizens, and newspapers. To come forth with such a rule would be to virtually read the First Amendment out of the Constitution and, thus, cost this nation one of its strongest tenets. 476 F.2d at 579. 7 Judge McDonald found that KUHT-TV was a public forum and concluded that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We are well beyond the belief that any manner of state regulation is permissible simply because it involves an activity which is a part of the university structure and is financed with funds controlled by the administration. The state is not necessarily the unrestrained master of what it creates and fosters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.