Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 FSUPP 1315 - Michelson v. Cox

Michelson v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2013

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

6019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Wolff v. McDonnell · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Dandridge v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reclassify as a resident every student who, after attending the University for a year, makes a self-serving declaration that he intends to reside in [Michigan] permanently and performs a series of “objective” acts, some of which are required by law and all of which are customarily done by some non-resident students who do not intend to remain in [Michigan] after graduation. This would, in effect, create a presumption that any such student is a bona fide [Michigan] resident, thus seriously jeopardizing the University’s nonresident tuition program and consequently its entire financial structure. It would remove the tuition decision from the hands of the University and place it in the student’s.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the preparation of detailed findings of fact in every case would entail considerable administrative expense and delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.