¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
¶2MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons stated in her dissent in People v. Conway,474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).