State v. Hook’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2018
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1152 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 1154 · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on United States v. Wheeler · Williams v. Lee · White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker · Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia · Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, a valid arrest may not be made outside the territorial jurisdiction of the arresting authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“undermine the right of reservation Indians to make their own laws and be ruled by them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.