Heldenbrand v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 1988
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Heflin v. United States · Prince v. United States · Ex Parte Nielsen · 11 Okla. Crim. 103 - Estep v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A series of criminal charges cannot . be based upon the same criminal act or transaction; a single criminal act cannot be split up or subdivided into two or more distinct offenses . . .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““[W]here, as in this case, a person has been tried and convicted for a crime which has various incidents included in it, he cannot be a second time tried for one of those incidents without' being twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““No person can be subjected to a second prosecution for a public offense for which he has once been prosecuted and duly convicted or acquitted, except as hereinafter provided for new trials.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Branch v. Mills
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.