Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 P2D 375 - Heldenbrand v. Mills

Heldenbrand v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 1988
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Heflin v. United States · Prince v. United States · Ex Parte Nielsen · 11 Okla. Crim. 103 - Estep v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A series of criminal charges cannot . be based upon the same criminal act or transaction; a single criminal act cannot be split up or subdivided into two or more distinct offenses . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[W]here, as in this case, a person has been tried and convicted for a crime which has various incidents included in it, he cannot be a second time tried for one of those incidents without' being twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““No person can be subjected to a second prosecution for a public offense for which he has once been prosecuted and duly convicted or acquitted, except as hereinafter provided for new trials.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.