Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 P.2d 384 - Choate v. State

Choate v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1986
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 87 Okla. Crim. 313 - Lowrey v. State · Young v. State · 60 Okla. Crim. 1 - Methvin v. State · 60 Okla. Crim. 339 - Grable v. State · 37 Okla. Crim. 76 - Townsend v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is elementary that if defendant believed this event was incorrect, improper, or prejudicial he should have entered an objection and thereby allowed the trial judge the opportunity to alter the action defendant now claims was improper. Defendant had ample opportunity to indicate his disfavor and failed to do so at the proper time. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.