Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 476 So. 2d 1244 - McWilliams v. State

476 So. 2d 1244 - McWilliams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1992
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Oregon v. Elstad · Beckwith v. United States · Truex v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Interrogation includes either 'express questioning or its functional equivalent,' that is 'words or actions on the part of the police . . . [which] the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Spontaneous statements that are volunteered by the defendant are admissible despite a failure to comply with Miranda safeguards.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The Miranda safeguards are required only when a suspect is interrogated in a custodial setting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.